[1]郭思彤,马艳梅,毛旭.中心群组化孕期保健模式对高龄二胎产妇分娩结局的影响分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2020,42(01):99-103.
 GUO Sitong,MA Yanmei,MAO Xu.Effect of center group pregnancy care mode on outcome of delivery in elderly pregnant parturient for a second child[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2020,42(01):99-103.
点击复制

中心群组化孕期保健模式对高龄二胎产妇分娩结局的影响分析(/HTML )
分享到:

《第三军医大学学报》[ISSN:1000-5404/CN:51-1095/R]

卷:
42卷
期数:
2020年第01期
页码:
99-103
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2020-01-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of center group pregnancy care mode on outcome of delivery in elderly pregnant parturient for a second child
作者:
郭思彤马艳梅毛旭
锦州医科大学:护理学院,附属第一医院护理部
Author(s):
GUO Sitong MA Yanmei MAO Xu

College of Nursing, 2Department of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, 121000, China

关键词:
中心群组化孕期保健模式高龄产妇二胎助产士分娩结局心理状态
Keywords:
center group pregnancy care mode elderly pregnant women second child midwife delivery outcomes psychological state
分类号:
R169.1; R181.37; R715.3
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

目的探讨中心群组化孕期保健模式对高龄二胎产妇分娩结局的影响。方法选取2018年3月至2019年3月在锦州医科大学附属第一医院产科门诊建卡并定期产检的年龄超过35周岁高龄二胎产妇作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为试验组(50 例)和对照组(50 例)。试验组应用中心群组化孕期保健模式,对照组采用传统孕期保健模式。比较两组产妇顺产率、剖宫产率、侧切率、产钳助产率、产后2 h出血量、产程时间、SAS和SDS评分情况以及患者满意度。结果最终两组共100例产妇均完成该研究,试验组顺产率、患者满意度均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),试验组剖宫产率、侧切率及第一、二、三产程及总产程时间,产后2 h出血量及产妇产后SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组新生儿Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论中心群组化孕期保健模式在降低高龄二胎产妇剖宫产率、会阴侧切率、减少产程时间、产后2 h出血量、减轻高龄二胎产妇产后焦虑和抑郁程度等方面具有一定的效果,能够提高高龄二胎产妇的顺产率及满意度。

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of center group pregnancy care mode on the outcome of delivery in elderly pregnant parturient for a second child. MethodsA total of 100 pregnant (over 35 years old) women for a second child who established Obstetrical Outpatient Card and underwent regular checkup in our First Affiliated Hospital from March 2018 to March 2019 were recruited in this study. They were randomly divided into experimental group (n=50) and control group (n=50). For the experimental group, the participants accepted not only the prenatal clinic consultation but also subject course of center group pregnancy care mode, while the participants in the control group were given the traditional pregnancy care mode. Natural delivery rate, cesarean section rate, episiotomy rate, forceps delivery rate, postpartum hemorrhage rate in 2 h after delivery, labor time, Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores, and patient’s satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsEventually, a total of 100 pregnant women completed this clinical trial. The experimental group had significantly higher natural delivery rate and patient’s satisfaction, obviously lower cesarean section rate and episiotomy rate, shorter durations for the first, second and third stage of labor and for total labor, decreased postpartum hemorrhage rate, and reduced SAS and SDS scores when compared with the control group (P<0.05). No significant difference was seen in the Apgar score between the babies of the 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe center group pregnancy care mode can reduce the cesarean section rate, episiotomy rate and postpartum hemorrhage rate, shorten time for stage of labor, attenuate the postpartum anxiety and depression, and improve natural childbirth rate and patient’s satisfaction.

参考文献/References:

[1]MARTIN J A, HAMILTON B E, OSTERMAN M J, et al.Births: final data for 2013[J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep,2015,15;64(1):1-65.
[2]黎丹, 黄剑青, 张兵, 等. 二胎政策开放后对高龄经产妇妊娠特征及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2019, 10(1): 51-53, 56.
LI D, HUANG J Q, ZHIANG B, et al. Effects of the universal two-chil d policy on the pregnancy characteristics and pregnancy outcome of elderly multiparturients[J]. Chin J Women Child Heal, 2019, 10(1): 51-53, 56.
[3]许祥竹, 周瑾. 对二胎高龄产妇的心理分析及护理干预[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2017, 4(59): 11613-11614. DOI:10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2017.59.071.
XU X Z, ZHOU J. Psychological analysis and nursing intervention for the elderly maternal with second birth [J]. J Clin Med Lit, 2017, 4(59): 11613-11614. DOI:10.16281/j.cnki.jocml.2017.59.071.
[4]顾金甜, 石红丽, 王彭, 等. 徐州市高龄二胎孕妇妊娠压力现状及其影响因素调查[J]. 全科护理, 2018, 16(27): 3433-3435.
GU J T, SHI H L, WANG P, et al. Investigation on the present situation of pregnancy pressure and its influencing factors in second year pregnant women [J]. Chin Gen Pract Nurs, 2018, 16(27): 3433-3435.
[5]潘旋, 张晶, 张邢炜. 国外集中群组孕期保健模式的应用研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016, 51(8): 988-991.
PAN X, ZHANG J, ZHANG X W. Review of application and research on centering pregnancy model in foreign countries[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2016, 51(8): 988-991.
[6]DECESARE J Z, JACKSON J R. Centering pregnancy: practical tips for your practice[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291(3): 499-507. DOI:10.1007/s00404-014-3467-2.
[7]金忠玉, 盛琼, 汪显敏, 等. 孕妇精神状况对妊娠结局及分娩方式的影响[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2016, 25(10): 74-75.
JIN Z Y, SHENG Q, WANG X M, et al. The influence of pregnant women’s mental status on pregnancy outcome and delivery mode [J]. Chin J Ethnomed Ethnopharm, 2016, 25(10): 74-75.
[8]韩佩伟. 中国剖宫产现状及其远期影响[J]. 中国保健营养, 2013, 23(8):2214-2214.
HAN P W. Current status and long-term effects of cesarean section in China [J]. China Health Nutr, 2013, 23(8):2214-2214.
[9]孔欣, 郭培奋. 经阴道头位分娩中倡导限制会阴切开[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2012, 28(2): 117-120.
KONG X, GUO P F. Restricted use of episiotomy in spontaneously vaginal delivery[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2012, 28(2): 117-120.
[10]张晨凌. 高龄经产妇、高龄初产妇及非高龄经产妇的妊娠结局比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2016, 20(9): 197-198.
ZHANG C L. Pregnancy outcomes of older multipara, older primipara and non-older multipara [J]. J Clin Med Pract, 2016, 20(9): 197-198.
[11]姜梅.新母婴护理模式实践[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2013:143-144.
JIANG M. Practice of new maternal and infant nursing model[M].Beijing: People’s Military Medical Publishing House, 2013:143-144.
[12]张方芳, 徐永莲, 刘兴会, 等. 产后出血原因及相关危险因素135例临床分析[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2014, 30(2): 144-146.
ZHANG F F, XU Y L, LIU X H, et al. The clinical analysis of the reasons and related risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage in 135 cases[J]. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 30(2): 144-146.
[13]陈丹丹, 李益民, 周临, 等. 初产妇对助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健服务的体验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(12): 32-34.
CHEN D D, LI Y M, ZHOU L, et al. Primiparas’ experiences of participating in a midwife-led centering pregnancy program: aqualitative research[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2018, 33(12): 32-34.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-07