[1]徐闯,张亚庆,黄博,等.基于O-arm®的计算机辅助导航技术在单开门颈椎管扩大成形术中应用的临床评价[J].第三军医大学学报,2018,40(24):2254-2259.
 XU Chuang,ZHANG Yaqing,HUANG Bo,et al.Application of computer-assisted navigation technology based on O-arm® in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty: analysis of 26 cases[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2018,40(24):2254-2259.
点击复制

基于O-arm®的计算机辅助导航技术在单开门颈椎管扩大成形术中应用的临床评价(/HTML )
分享到:

《第三军医大学学报》[ISSN:1000-5404/CN:51-1095/R]

卷:
40卷
期数:
2018年第24期
页码:
2254-2259
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2018-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of computer-assisted navigation technology based on O-arm® in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty: analysis of 26 cases
作者:
徐闯张亚庆黄博周跃
陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第二附属医院骨科
Author(s):
XU Chuang ZHANG Yaqing HUANG Bo ZHOU Yue

Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China

关键词:
颈椎管狭窄症O-arm®计算机导航椎管扩大成形术单开门
Keywords:
cervical spinal stenosis O-arm® computer-assisted navigation expansive laminoplasty unilateral open-door
分类号:
R318.6;R616;R653
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

目的  探究应用基于O-arm®的计算机辅助导航技术在单开门颈椎管扩大成形术中应用的可行性,并对其临床效果进行评价。方法  收集2014年5月至2017年10月,在我科应用基于O-arm®的计算机辅助导航技术行单开门颈椎管扩大成形术治疗颈椎管狭窄症的患者26例,男性21例,女性5例;年龄33~76岁,平均59.4岁。根据日本骨科协会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)评分(17分法)及其改善率评价术后神经功能改善情况。根据术后6个月复查影像学结果评价椎管扩大情况及门轴侧骨融合情况。结果   患者手术时间(162.2±24.0)min,术中出血量(282.7±117.0)mL,术中未出现相关并发症。患者术后随访时间6.0~46.4个月,平均22.8个月,术前JOA评分8.1±2.7,末次随访JOA评分13.4±2.7,所有患者临床症状均有不同程度改善(P<0.05),术后改善率(58.2±30.4)%。患者术后6个月患者影像学资料提示椎管扩大满意,门轴侧均见骨性融合,未出现再关门情况及神经损害加重的情况。结论   应用基于O-arm®的计算机辅助导航技术开展单开门颈椎管扩大成形术,其手术方式安全可行,临床效果令人满意。

Abstract:

Objective To explore the feasibility of computer-assisted navigation technology based on O-arm® in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty and evaluate its safety and therapeutic effect in patients with cervical spinal stenosis. Methods From May 2014 to October 2017, 26 patients with cervical spinal stenosis, including 21 male and 5 female patients with a mean age of 59.4 years (range 33-76 years), underwent unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty in our department with computer-assisted navigation technology based on O-arm®. The postoperative neurological improvement of the patients was evaluated by assessing the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score (17 points) and the improvement rate. All the patients underwent imaging examinations at 6 months after the operation to assess postoperative spinal canal enlargement and bone fusion on the hinge side. ResultsThe mean operation time was 162.2±24.0 min in these cases with a mean intraoperative blood loss of 282.7±117.0 mL; no complications occurred during the operation. All the patients were followed up for 6.0-46.4 months (mean 22.8±10.5 months). The mean JOA score of the patients before the operation was 8.1±2.7, which increased to 13.4±2.7 at the final follow-up. All the patients showed significant improvements of the clinical symptoms (P<0.05) with a mean improvement rate of (58.2±30.4)%. At 6 months after operation, all the patients, except for 1 patient who was lost to the follow-up, showed satisfactory enlargement of the spinal canal and bony fusion on the hinge side without recurrence of cervical stenosis or neurofunction deterioration. Conclusion Unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty with computer-assisted navigation technology based on O-arm® is safe and feasible and can achieve satisfactory therapeutic effect for treatment of cervical spinal stenosis.

参考文献/References:

[1]PERRINI P, GAMBACCIANI C, MARTINI C, et al. Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: reconstruction with expandable cylindrical cage versus iliac crest autograft. A retrospective study[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015,139: 258-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.10.023.
[2]TETREAULT L, KOPJAR B, C T  P, et al. A clinical prediction rule for functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of an international prospective multicenter data set of 757 subjects[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(24): 2038-2046. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00189.
[3]HIRABAYASHI K, WATANABE K, WAKANO K, et al. Expansive opendoor laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenoticmyelopathy[J]. Spine, 1983, 8(7): 693-699.
[4]PARK AE, HELLER JG. Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansionsurgical technique[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004, 17(4): 265-271. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000095401.27687.c0.
[5]SONNTAG V K H. A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization: a computerized morphometric analysis[J]. Spine,1996, 21(4): 484.
[6]YEH KT, YU TC, CHEN IH, et al. Expansive opendoor laminoplasty secured with titanium miniplates is a good surgical method for multiplelevel cervical stenosis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2014, 9: 49. DOI: 10.1186/s1301801400498.
[7]JIANG L, CHEN W, CHEN Q, et al. Clinical application of a new plate fixation system in opendoor laminoplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(2): e225-e231.DOI: 10.3928/014774472012012307.
[8]CHEN G, LUO Z, NALAJALA B, et al. Expansive opendoor laminoplasty with titanium miniplate versus sutures[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(4): e543-e548. DOI: 10.3928/014774472012032724.
[9]周鹏, 李玉伟, 张生, 等. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大术疗效不佳原因分析及对策[J]. 河北联合大学学报(医学版), 2012, 14(3): 384-385.
ZHOU P, LI Y W, ZHANG S, et al. Analysis of the causes of the poor effects of expansive opendoor laminoplasty by posterior cervical approach and its countermeasure[J]. J Hebei United Univ(Health Sci), 2012, 14(3): 384-385.
[10]Spinal surgery imaging Oarm surgical imaging system[EB/OL]. [20180620].http://www.medtronic.com/usen/healthcareprofessionals/products/neurological/surgicalimagingsystems/oarm/spinalimaging.html.
[11]RAHMATHULLA G, NOTTMEIER E W, PIRRIS S M, et al. Intraoperative imageguided spinal navigation: technical pitfalls and their avoidance[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2014, 36(3): E3. DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13516.
[12]VAN DE KELFT E, COSTA F, VAN DER PLANKEN D, et al. A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the Oarm imaging system and Stealth Station Navigation[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(25): E1580-E1587. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318271b1fa.
[13]NASSER R, DRAZIN D, NAKHLA J, et al. Resection of spinal column tumors utilizing imageguided navigation: a multicenter analysis[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2016, 41(2): E15. DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16136.
[14]PISAPIA J M, NAYAK N R, SALINAS R D, et al. Navigated odontoid screw placement using the Oarm: technical note and case series[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2017, 26(1): 10-18. DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.SPINE151412.
[15]JIA M, WANG J, ZHANG Z, et al. Direct repair of lumbar pars interarticularisdefects by utilizing intraoperative Oarmbased navigation and microendoscopictechniques[J]. Spine, 2016, 41(Suppl 19): B6-B13. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000 000000001815.
[16]汪雷, 李涛, 宋跃明, 等. 单开门颈椎管扩大成形Centerpiece钛板内固定术治疗颈椎管狭窄症的早期临床疗效[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2011, 21(8): 654-658. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004406X.2011.08.07.
WANG L, LI T, SONG Y M, et al.Early clinical efficacy of unilateral opendoor cervical expansive laminoplasty plus centerpiece titanium plate fixation for cervical spinal stenosis[J]. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord, 2011, 21(8): 654-658. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004406X.2011.08.07.
[17]LEE D H, PARK S A, KIM N H, et al. Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi opendoor laminoplasty[J]. Spine, 2011, 36(25): E1634-E1640. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318215552c.
[18]YU H L, XIANG LB, LIU J, et al. Laminoplasty using Twinfix suture anchors to maintain cervical canal expansion[J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(10): 1795-1798. DOI: 10.1007/s0058601014195.
[19]QI Q, LI L, LUOJ, et al. Is miniplate fixation superior to suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty? A Metaanalysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 93: 144-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.011.
[20]LIU G, BUCHOWSKI J M, BUNMAPRASERT T, et al. Revision surgery following cervical laminoplasty: etiology and treatment strategies[J]. Spine, 2009, 34(25): 2760-2768. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b11ee1.
[21]HOSONO N, YONENOBU K, ONO K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication[J]. Spine, 1996, 21(17): 1969-1973. DOI: 10.1097/0000763219960901000005.
[22]SAKAURA H, HOSONO N, MUKAI Y, et al. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature[J]. Spine, 2003, 28(21): 2447-2451. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F.
[23]LEE H J, AHN J S, SHIN B, et al. C4/5 foraminal stenosis predicts C5 palsy after expansive opendoor laminoplasty[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(9): 2340-2347. DOI: 10.1007/s0058601750778.
[24]KATSUMI K, YAMAZAKI A, WATANABE K, et al. Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after opendoor laminoplasty a prospective study[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(9): 748-754. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326957.
[25]PLANCHARD R F, MALONEY P R, MALLORY G W, et al. Postoperative delayed cervical palsies: understanding the etiology[J]. Global Spine J, 2016, 6(6): 571-583. DOI: 10.1055/s00351570084.
[26]SMITH J D, JACK M M, HARN N R, et al. Screw placement accuracy and outcomes following Oarmnavigated atlantoaxialfusion: afeasibility study[J]. Global Spine J, 2016, 6(4): 344-349. DOI: 10.1055/s00351563723.
[27]SEMBRANO J N, SANTOS E R, POLLY DW J R. New generation intraoperative threedimensional imaging (Oarm) in 100 spine surgeries: Does it change the surgical procedure? [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2014, 21(2): 225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.04.011.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-02