[1]王延洲,陈功立,徐嘉莉,等.单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌:一项单中心的初步研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2017,39(13):1392-1395.
 WANG Yanzhou,CHEN Gongli,XU Jiali,et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center trial[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2017,39(13):1392-1395.
点击复制

单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗宫颈癌:一项单中心的初步研究(/HTML )
分享到:

《第三军医大学学报》[ISSN:1000-5404/CN:51-1095/R]

卷:
39卷
期数:
2017年第13期
页码:
1392-1395
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2017-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center trial
作者:
王延洲陈功立徐嘉莉李玉迪邓黎陈诚梁小龙徐惠成梁志清
第三军医大学西南医院妇产科
Author(s):
WANG Yanzhou CHEN Gongli XU Jiali LI Yudi DENG Li CHEN Cheng LIANG Xiaolong XU Huicheng LIANG Zhiqing

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China

关键词:
宫颈癌单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫
Keywords:
cervical cancer single-port laparoscopic surgery radical hysterectomy pelvic lymphadenectomy
分类号:
R195.4; R730.56; R737.33
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

目的       探讨单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫治疗早期宫颈癌的可行性、安全性和短期临床结局。方法       2016年10月至2017年3月前瞻性纳入第三军医大学西南医院妇产科诊断为宫颈癌的患者,行单孔腹腔镜广泛子宫切除+盆腔淋巴结清扫术。统计患者人口学特征、临床肿瘤学结局和围手术期效果。结果       27例患者尝试手术,26例成功完成(96%),1例因术中探查合并Ⅳ期子宫内膜异位症而中转为多孔腹腔镜手术。患者中位年龄46岁,体质量指数为22.1 kg/m 2,中位手术时间237 min,术中失血量平均186 mL。2例术中血管损伤,1例膀胱损伤,均在术中单孔腹腔镜下完成修补。平均盆腔淋巴结清扫数目21枚,手术切缘病理学检查均为阴性。1例患者因2枚盆腔淋巴结转移,术后进行化疗+放疗;7例合并中危因素患者,术后进行放疗。结论       具有丰富的妇科肿瘤腹腔镜手术经验的医生熟练掌握单孔腹腔镜手术技术的情况下,采用单孔腹腔镜手术是进行广泛子宫切除盆腔淋巴结清扫手术是可行的。

Abstract:

Objective       To investigate the feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (LESS-RH/PLND) in treatment of cervical cancer. Methods      Cervical cancer patients diagnosed and treated with LESS-RH/PLND in Southwest Hospital from October 2016 to March 2017 were prospectively enrolled in this study. The demographic data, and clinical, pathological and peri-operative outcomes were analyzed. Results       Twenty-seven women were recruited and attempted for LESS-RH/PLND. Twenty-six (96%) underwent the procedure successfully, and 1 patient was converted to 3-port laparoscopy due to stage IV endometriosis. Their median age was 46 years, and body mass index was 22.1 kg/m2. Their median operation time was 237 min and intraoperative blood loss was 186 mL. Two cases of large veins lacerations and one of bladder injury occurred during operation, and all were sutured promptly under a laparoendoscope. The median number of pelvic lymph node removal was 21. All surgical margins were negative. One patient received postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy because of 2 positive pelvic nodes. Another 7 patients received radiation therapy after the surgery because of complication of risk factors. Conclusion      For the doctors with rich experience in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery and mastering the technique of single-port laparoscopic surgery, LESSRH/PLND is feasible and safe for cervical cancer patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]WANG Y Z, DENG L, XU H C, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2015, 15: 928. DOI:10.1186/s12885-015-1818-4.
[2]BORUTA D M. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: An update[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 141(3): 616-623. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.014.
[3]XU H, CHEN Y, LI Y, et al. Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(6): 960-964. DOI:10.1007/s00464-006-9129-0.
[4]CIBULA D, ABU-RUSTUM N R, BENEDETTI-PANICI P, et al. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 122(2): 264-268. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029.
[5]American college of obstetricians and gynecologists women’s health care physicians.. Technology assessment no. 10: single-incision laparoscopy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(2 Pt 1): 429-431. DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000433009.93971.23.
[6]MENDIVIL A A, RETTENMAIER M A, ABAID L N, et al. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience[J]. Surg Oncol, 2016, 25(1): 66-71. DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2015.09.004.
[7]SERT B M, BOGGESS J F, AHMAD S, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(4): 513-522. DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014.
[8]PARK D A, YUN J E, KIM S W, et al. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robotassisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, pii: S07487983(16)30687-4.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017.
[9]GARRETT L A, BORUTA D M 2ND. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy: the first report of LESS type III hysterectomy involves a woman with cervical cancer[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 207(6): 518-511. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.868.
[10]BORUTA D M, FAGOTTI A, BRADFORD L S, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: initial multi-institutional experience for treatment of invasive cervical cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(3): 394-398. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.005.
[11]FIGURELLI J, BRESSON L, NARDUCCI F,  et al. Single-port access laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology: outcomes and feasibility[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2014, 24(6): 1126-1132. DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000150.
[12]BEDAIWY M A, SHEYN D, EGHDAMI L, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for benign ovarian cystectomies[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2015, 79(3): 179-183. DOI:10.1159/000367659.
[13]PARK J Y, KIM DY, KIM SH, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site compared with conventional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22(5): 813-819. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.012.
[14]LEE J, KIM S, NAM E J, et al. Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2015, 58(3): 239-245. DOI:10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.239.
[15]PARK J Y, NHO J, CHO I J, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(4): 890-897. DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3747-8.
[16]梁志清, 徐惠成, 熊光武,等. 腹腔镜在子宫颈癌治疗中的应用——附37例分析[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2002, 2(s1):62-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2002.z1.030.
LIANG Z Q, XU H C, XIONG G W, et al. Application of laparoscopy in the treatment of cervical cancer——analysis of 37 cases[J]. Chin J Mini Inv Surg, 2002, 2(s1):62-63.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2002.z1.030.

相似文献/References:

[1]李彦锋,孙中义,吴刚,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜下精索内静脉高位结扎术46例临床分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2010,32(24):2647.
 Li Yanfeng,Sun Zhongyi,Wu Gang,et al.Modified trans-umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy: a retro spective report of 46 cases[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2010,32(13):2647.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-14