[1]李世文,石娇,华兴,等.超声评分系统在干燥综合征中的诊断价值[J].第三军医大学学报,2017,39(10):996-1000.
 Li Shiwen,Shi Jiao,Hua Xing,et al.Value of an ultrasonographic scoring system in diagnosis of Sjgren’s syndrome[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2017,39(10):996-1000.
点击复制

超声评分系统在干燥综合征中的诊断价值(/HTML )
分享到:

《第三军医大学学报》[ISSN:1000-5404/CN:51-1095/R]

卷:
39卷
期数:
2017年第10期
页码:
996-1000
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2017-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of an ultrasonographic scoring system in diagnosis of Sjgren’s syndrome
作者:
李世文石娇华兴郭燕丽李景怡邹庆华
重庆市南岸区人民医院超声科;第三军医大学西南医院:超声科,中西医结合风湿免疫科
Author(s):
Li Shiwen Shi Jiao Hua Xing Guo Yanli Li Jingyi Zou Qinghua

Department of Ultrasonography, Nan’an District People’s Hospital, Chongqing, 400060; Department of Ultrasonography, Department of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Rheumatology and Immunology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China

关键词:
干燥综合征超声评分系统诊断
Keywords:
Sj-gren&rsquos syndrome ultrasonography scoring system diagnosis
分类号:
R181.32; R445.1; R593.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

目的       评价唾液腺半定量超声评分系统在干燥综合征(Sj-gren’s syndrome,SS)中的诊断价值。方法      2014年6月至2016年6月于西南医院风湿免疫科怀疑为SS的98例患者纳入研究,男性35例,女性63例,年龄35~72岁,平均(52.3±19.8)岁。回顾性分析其腮腺和颌下腺超声检查灰阶与彩色多普勒血流显像声像图表现,将其分为0~4级,获得相应评分,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating curve,ROC),计算曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC),评价其诊断价值。对唾液腺超声评分左右侧之间的差异进行比较。对工作经验分别为10年和2年的两名医师评分一致性进行检验。结果      98例患者中53例确诊为SS,45例被排除。唾液腺超声评分所形成ROC曲线AUC为0.892。以2为截断点,唾液腺超声评分法诊断SS的敏感性为94.34%,特异性为88.89%,阳性预测值为90.91%,阴性预测值为93.02%。腮腺和颌下腺超声评分左右侧之间无显著差异性(P>0.05)。不同工作经验的两名医师评分一致性分析Kappa值0.884(P<0.05)。结论     唾液腺超声0-4级半定量评分系统对SS具有较高的诊断价值,且观察者一致性好,可用于SS的临床诊断。

Abstract:

Objective     To evaluate the value of a semi-quantitative ultrasonographic scoring system of the salivary glands in the diagnosis of Sj-gren’s syndrome (SS). Methods     Ninety-eight patients with a suspected diagnosis of SS in the Southwest Hospital between June 2014 and June 2016 were included in the study. The imaging findings by grey-scale ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasonography of the salivary glands were analyzed and graded according to a 5-point (0~4) ultrasonographic scoring system. The receiver-operating curve (ROC) was drawn and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated to test the diagnostic performance of this scoring system for SS. The difference in the scores between the bilateral salivary glands was analyzed, and the inter-observer agreement in scoring was tested between two physicians with 10 and 2 years of ultrasound experiences. Results      Among the 98 patients, a definite diagnosis of SS was established in 53 patients, and SS was excluded in the other 45 cases. The AUC of the ROC for the ultrasonographic scores of the salivary glands was 0.892. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this system for SS diagnosis, with the score of 2 as the cut-off point, were 94.34%, 88.89%, 90.91% and 93.02%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the scores between the bilateral salivary glands (P>0.05), and the Kappa value of the inter-observer agreement was 0.884 (P<0.05). Conclusion     The semi-quantitative ultrasonohraphic scoring system of the salivary glands has a good diagnostic value for SS with a good inter-observer agreement, and can be used for clinical diagnosis of SS.
 

参考文献/References:

[1]Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, et al. Classification criteria for Sjgren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the AmericanEuropean Consensus Group [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2002, 61(6): 554-558. DOI: 10.1136/ard.61.6.554.
[2]Goules A V, Tzioufas A G. Imaging: diagnostic value of ultrasonography in Sjgren’s syndrome [J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2014, 10(8): 450-452. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.86.
[3]Takagi Y, Kimura Y, Nakamura H, et al. Salivary gland ultrasonography: can it be an alternative to sialography as an imaging modality for Sjogren’s syndrome?[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010, 69(7): 1321-1324. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.123836.
[4]Jonsson M V, Baldini C. Major Salivary Gland Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Sjgren’s Syndrome: A Place in the Diagnostic Criteria?[J]. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2016, 42(3): 501-517. DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2016.03.008.
[5]王依宁, 王学梅, 欧国成. 干燥综合征患者的颌下腺超声表现[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2012, 28(1): 23-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10020101.
Wang Y N, Wang X M, Ou G C. Ultrasonography of submandibular glands in patients with sjgren’s syndrome [J]. Chinese J Ultrasound Med, 2012, 28(1): 23-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10020101.
[6]Baldini C, Luciano N, Mosca M, et al. Salivary Gland Ultrasonography in Sjgren’s Syndrome: Clinical Usefulness and Future Perspectives [J]. Isr Med Assoc J, 2016, 18(3-4): 193-196.
[7]Luciano N, Baldini C, Tarantini G, et al. Ultrasonography of major salivary glands: a highly specific tool for distinguishing primary Sjgren’s syndrome from undifferentiated connective tissue diseases [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2015, 54(12): 2198-2204. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev253.
[8]Cornec D, JousseJoulin S, DevauchellePensec V, et al. Salivary gland ultrasonography improves the diagnostic performance of the 2012 American College of Rheumatology classifcation criteria for Sjgren’s syndrome [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2014, 53(9): 1604-1607. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu037.
[9]Milic V D, Petrovic R R, Boricic I V, et al. Major salivary gland sonography in Sjgren’s syndrome: diagnostic value of a novel ultrasonography score (012) for parenchymal inhomogeneity [J]. Scand J Rheumatol, 2010, 39(2): 160-166. DOI: 10.3109/03009740903270623.
[10]Saied F, WodkowskaKorytkowska M, Mas′lińska M, et al. The usefulness of ultrasound in the diagnostics of Sjgren’s syndrome [J]. J Ultrason. 2013, 13(53): 202-11. DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2013.0020.
[11]Zhang X, Zhang S, He J, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of major salivary glands in primary Sjgren’s syndrome: comparison of two scoring systems [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2015, 54(9): 1680-1687. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev103.
[12]周明珠, 宋淑菊, 段婷. 干燥综合征涎腺超声评分系统及临床应用价值[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2016, 36(9): 810-813. DOI: 10.7504/nk2016080703.
Zhou M Z, Song S J, Duan T. Scoring system of salivary gland ultrasonography in Sjgren’s syndrome and its clinical value [J]. Chinese J Practical Med, 2016, 36(9): 810-813. DOI: 10.7504/nk2016080703.
[13]Takagi Y, Sumi M, Nakamura H, et al. Ultrasonography as an additional item in the American College of Rheumatology classification of Sjgren’s syndrome [J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2014, 53(11): 1977-1983. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu238.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘城城,韩广玮,尚永刚,等.超声引导下细针穿刺注射大肠埃希菌建立大鼠慢性细菌性前列腺炎模型的探讨[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(19 ):1981.
 Liu Chengcheng,Han Guangwei,Shang Yonggang,et al.Establishment of a rat model of chronic bacterial prostatitis by ultrasound-guided fine needle injection of E. coli[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2015,37(10):1981.
[2]张善春,迟路湘,李锐,等.超声测定脑梗死患者血管舒张功能[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(20):2005.
 ZHANG Shan-chun,CHI Lu-xiang,LI Rui,et al.Ultrasonic measurement of vasodilation in cerebral infarction patients[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2007,29(10):2005.
[3]吕金利,郭树军,李永研,等.B超引导下经皮穿刺置管治疗腹腔残余感染[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(01):90.
[4]吴晓莉,龚业琼.检测中晚孕期胎儿静脉导管血流频谱的临床价值[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(20):2014.
[5]程果,郭燕丽,张绍祥,等.人体可视化肝脏与肝脏超声影像学的对照研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(23):2157.
 CHENG Guo,GUO Yan-li,ZHANG Shao-xiang,et al.Comparative study between visible human liver and ultrasonography[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(10):2157.
[6]杜毅力,曹永政,但家立,等.肿块活检联合诊断指标分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2005,27(19):2000.
[7]陈镜宇,全学模,郭振华,等.超声辐照维拉帕米微泡体外对神经母细胞瘤多药耐药的逆转作用[J].第三军医大学学报,2010,32(16):1724.
 Chen Jingyu,Quan Xuemo,Guo Zhenhua,et al.Ultrasound irradiation microbubble verapamil reverses multidrug resistance of neuroblastoma cells in vitro[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2010,32(10):1724.
[8]王均生,刘地川,黄晶,等.超声激活血卟啉促进新生大鼠心肌细胞凋亡[J].第三军医大学学报,2010,32(24):2604.
 Wang Junsheng,Liu Dichuan,Huang Jing,et al.Ultrasound-activated hematoporphyrin promotes apoptosis of cardiomyocytes of neonatal rats[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2010,32(10):2604.
[9]唐艳,熊正爱,李攀,等.超声联合微泡造影剂携p53基因转染宫颈癌HeLa细胞的实验研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2009,31(23):2323.
 TANG Yan,XIONG Zheng-ai,LI Pan,et al.Experimental study of p53 plasmid transfected into HeLa cells by ultrasound microbubble intensifier[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2009,31(10):2323.
[10]杨华,邹利光,余世勇,等.多层螺旋CTA与超声对比在颈部动脉疾病的诊断价值[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(16):1513.
 YANG Hua,ZOU Li-guang,YU Shi-yong,et al.16-slice CT angiography versus ultrasonography in cervical artery diseases[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(10):1513.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-22