[1]林鑫鑫,王允个,冯博,等.青年军人精神分裂症前驱期症状筛查问卷的编制及其信、效度检验[J].第三军医大学学报,2016,38(20):2219-2223.
 Lin Xinxin,Wang Yunge,Feng Bo,et al.Development of psychosis screening with prodromal questionnaire and evaluation of its reliability and validity[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2016,38(20):2219-2223.
点击复制

青年军人精神分裂症前驱期症状筛查问卷的编制及其信、效度检验(/HTML )
分享到:

《第三军医大学学报》[ISSN:1000-5404/CN:51-1095/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2016年第20期
页码:
2219-2223
栏目:
医学心理学
出版日期:
2016-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development of psychosis screening with prodromal questionnaire and evaluation of its reliability and validity
作者:
林鑫鑫王允个冯博吴雅静黄微牟海刚武圣君刘旭峰
第四军医大学医学心理系
Author(s):
Lin Xinxin Wang Yunge Feng Bo Wu Yajing Huang Wei Mou Haigang Wu Shengjun Liu Xufeng

Faculty of Psychology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, 710032, China

关键词:
精神分裂前驱期问卷心理健康信度效度
Keywords:
prodromal questionnaire mental health reliability validity
分类号:
R395.6;R749.3;R821.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

目的      编制1个适合筛查青年军人精神分裂前驱期状态的问卷,并检验其信度和效度。方法      在文献研究、专家讨论的基础上,编制精神分裂前驱期症状筛查问卷的初测版。进行小样本试测,经讨论分析形成正式版问卷。采取整群抽样的方法,抽取2 500名战士和军校大学生完成了本问卷和PQ-16量表。间隔8周抽取100人进行重测。对所得2 143份有效问卷的数据进行描述性统计和结构分析,并检验问卷的信、效度。结果       探索性因素分析得到认知改变、行为改变、社会功能改变、人格改变4个因素,因素负荷值在0.291~0.578。问卷的内部一致性信度0.957(P<0.05),重测信度0.884(P<0.01),与PQ-16相关系数为0.830(P<0.05)。结论      所编制的精神分裂前驱期症状筛查问卷具有良好的信、效度,可用于青年军人心理健康状态的筛查。

Abstract:

Objective     To design a prodromal questionnaire (PQ) for screening psychosis in young soldiers and to test its reliability and validity.  Methods      Based on published articles and specialists’ consensus, we established a preliminary version of PQ for psychosis screening. A final version of questionnaire was made after carrying out a trial of small samples. By cluster sampling, the PQ for psychosis and PQ-16 scales were administrated to 2 500 subjects among soldiers and students of military university. By random sampling, 100 subjects were tested for the second time after 8 weeks. Data from 2 143 effective questionnaires were analyzed by descriptive statistics and structural analysis, and its reliability and validity were investigated. Results      Four factors, i.e. cognitive change, behavioral change, social function change and personality change, were found by exploratory factor analysis. The value of factor loading ranged from 0.291 to 0.578. The internal consistency reliability was 0.957(P<0.05). The test-retest coefficient was 0.884(P<0.01). The correlation coefficient of the questionnaire with PQ-16 was 0.830. Conclusion      The results show good reliability and validity of the PQ for psychosis screening. It can be a useful tool for screening the mental health status of young soldiers.

参考文献/References:

[1]管丽丽, 杜立哲, 马弘. 精神分裂症的疾病负担(综述)[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(12): 913-919. DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.12.008
[2]刘平, 陈登国. 2005~2014年重庆市江北区精神分裂症患者住院费用调查分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(16): 2252-2254. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2016.16.031
[3]连玉佳, 石作宏, 洪峰, 等. 贵阳市南明区重性精神疾病流行病学调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(5): 541-544. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2014-30-05-01
[4]仇晓艳, 牛昕, 汤爱娣, 等. 长宁区精神疾病的流行病学特征分析及应对策略[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2014, 18(1): 25-28.
[5]葛小平, 周甲龙. 长沙市15岁以上人群精神分裂症现况调查[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 2014,24(5): 292-295. DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2014.05.002
[6]高君侠. 常州市遥观镇2013年重性精神疾病流行病学分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2015,5(5): 196-198.
[7]赵晓光, 赵姣文, 潘发明. 上海市嘉定区精神障碍患者流行病学特征分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2015,19(8): 1548-1550. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2015.08.037
[8]刘冬梅, 王志青, 杨永和, 等. 宜宾地区居民精神分裂症流行病学调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2013, 29(12): 1755-1757. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2013-29-12-12
[9]刘飞, 陆峥. 精神分裂症前驱期的早期识别及诊断[J].国际精神病学杂志, 2014,41(2): 88-91.
[10]高燕, 翟金国, 赵靖平, 等. 精神分裂症前驱期超高危人群的治疗干预进展[J].国际精神病学杂志, 2014,41(4): 208-211.
[11]Loewy R L, Pearson R, Vinogradov S, et al. Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire—Brief Version (PQB)[J]. Schizophr Res, 2011, 129(1): 42-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.029
[12]Olsen K A, Rosenbaum B. Prospective investigations of the prodromal state of schizophrenia: assessment instruments[J]. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 2006, 113(4): 273-282. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00698.x
[13]Müller M, Vetter S, BuchliKammermann J, et al. The Self-screen-Prodrome as a short screening tool for prepsychotic states[J]. Schizophr Res, 2010, 123(2/3): 217-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.08.018

相似文献/References:

[1]苏倩,王书孝,郭海涛,等.某军医大学硕士新生心理健康与个性特征调查分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2012,34(18):1916.
[2]贺英,赵梦雪,王皖曦,等.适应性团体心理训练对新兵心理健康和情绪的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(19 ):1972.
 He Ying,Zhao Mengxue,Wang Wanxi,et al.Adaptive group psychological training improves mental health and emotional states in new recruits[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2015,37(20):1972.
[3]汪涛,唐红英,舒勤,等.458名进藏新兵心理健康状况与影响因素分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2013,35(03):267.
 Wang Tao,Tang Hongying,Shu Qin,et al.Status of mental health in recruits at high altitude and related factors[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2013,35(20):267.
[4]杨国愉,冯正直,刘云波,等.团体心理训练对军医大学护理新生心理健康的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(18):1909.
[5]廖雅琴,胡彦,冯正直.我国军人心理健康研究的现状与展望[J].第三军医大学学报,2005,27(20):2090.
[6]姜巍,冯正直,年春志,等.陆军新兵元情绪能力与心理健康的关系及其影响因素研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2005,27(07):674.
[7]冯正直,祖霞.军人心理健康评价——理论与模型[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(22):2207.
 Feng Zhengzhi,Zu Xia.Mental health assessment for military men: theories and model[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2015,37(20):2207.
[8]王鑫强,何晓新.中国军人心理健康研究进展[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(22):2213.
 Wang Xinqiang,He Xiaoxin.Progress of Chinese Military Mental Health[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2015,37(20):2213.
[9]冯正直,刘潇.中美军人心理健康概念、评价和训练比较分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(22):2218.
 Feng Zhengzhi,Liu Xiao.Sino-US military mental health: a comparative analysis on concepts, evaluation and training[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2015,37(20):2218.
[10]杨国愉,晏玲,王皖曦,等.中国赴利比里亚抗击埃博拉军人心理健康的追踪研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2015,37(22):2229.
 Yang Guoyu,Yan Ling,Wang Wanxi,et al.Longitudinal investigation on mental health of armymen sent to Liberia against Ebola[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2015,37(20):2229.

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-24