[1]卞薇,吴燕,周明芳,等.患者安全胜任力护理人员自评量表的编制及信效度评价[J].第三军医大学学报,2016,38(07):776-780.
 Bian Wei,Wu Yan,Zhou Mingfang,et al.Development and evaluation of a rating scale of patient safety competency for nurses[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2016,38(07):776-780.
点击复制

患者安全胜任力护理人员自评量表的编制及信效度评价(/HTML )
分享到:

《第三军医大学学报》[ISSN:1000-5404/CN:51-1095/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2016年第07期
页码:
776-780
栏目:
公共卫生与预防医学
出版日期:
2016-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development and evaluation of a rating scale of patient safety competency for nurses
作者:
卞薇吴燕周明芳蒋艳
第三军医大学:西南医院眼科,护理学院
Author(s):
Bian Wei Wu Yan Zhou Mingfang Jiang Yan

Department of Ophthalmology, Southwest Hospital, School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China

关键词:
护理人员患者安全胜任力量表信度效度
Keywords:
nurses patient safety competency scale reliability validity
分类号:
R192.6; R395.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:

目的      编制患者安全胜任力护理人员自评量表(patient safety competency self-rating scale of nurses, PSCSSN)。      方法      在全面查阅和研究国内外相关文献的基础上,经2轮专家的函调和预实验对量表的条目进行评价、修改和筛选,形成最终的PSCSSN量表,以3所三级甲等医院791例护理人员为研究对象进行信效度检验。      结果      量表由29个条目组成,探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,与量表理论构建基本一致,各条目在所属因子上的载荷为0.471~0.817,累积方差解释率为64.598%。因子间的相关系数为0.242~0.519,各因子与总分的相关系数为0.619~0.822。培训组护理人员PSCSSN总量表得分明显高于未培训组(P<0.01)。量表总的Cronbach’s α为0.930,重测信度为0.945,各个因子的Cronbach’s α在0.777~0.863,重测信度在0.867~0.927。      结论      PSCSSN量表具有较好的信度和效度,可以作为评估护理人员的患者安全胜任力的测量工具。

Abstract:

Objective      To develop a rating scale for evaluating the patient safety competency for nurses.       Methods      Based on our overall review on domestic and international literature, the scale was formulated through 2 cycles of expert evaluation and pre-testing on evaluation, modification and screening on relative items. A total of 791 nurses from 3 Grade A Class III hospitals were recruited to test the reliability and validity of the scale.       Results      Our produced rating scale for patient safety competency contained 29 items. Four factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and corresponded well with the theoretical construction. Factor loading ranged from 0.471 to 0.817 and the 4 factors explained for 64.598% variances. The correlation coefficients of each factor and the total scores were from 0.619 to 0.822. The correlation coefficients of each factors were 0.242~0.519. The total scores were significant higher in the nurses after training than the un-training group (P<0.01). The Cronbach’s α of the total scale was 0.930, with its retest-reliability of 0.945. And the Cronbach’s α of the every factors ranged from 0.777 to 0.863, with their retest-reliability from 0.867 to 0.972.       Conclusion      Our newly developed rating scale of patient safety competency has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an effective measurement to test the patient safety competency for nurses.

参考文献/References:

[1]Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: The Official Handbook[M]. Washington: Joint Commission on, 2007.
[2]美国医疗机构评审国际联合委员会. 美国医疗机构评审国际联合委员会医院评审标准[S]. 陈同鉴, 王羽, 周简, 译. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2008.
[3]WHO Word Alliance for Patient Safety. Summary of the evidence on patient safety: implications for research[M]. Geneva: WHO Press, 2008.
[4]Jha A K, Larizgoitia I, Audera-Lopez C, et al. The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modeling of observational studies[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2013, 22(10): 809-815. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001748
[5]Kohn L T, Corrigan J M, Donaldson M S. To Err Is Human: Building a safer Health System[M]. Washington: National Academies Press, 1999: 26-29.
[6]曹荣桂.中国医疗质量与患者安全[J].中国医院, 2007, 11(11): 1-4.
[7]Parry S B. The Quest for Competencies[J]. Training, 1996, 33(7): 48-54, 56.
[8]Koschack J, Marx G, Schnakenberg J, et al. Comparison of two self-rating instruments for medication adherence assessment in hypertension revealed insufficient psychometric properties[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(3) : 299-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.011
[9]Matsubara S, Hagihara A, Nobutomo K. Development of a patient safety climate scale in Japan[J]. Int J Qual Health Care, 2008, 20(3): 211-220. DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzn003
[10]Sexton J B, Helmreich R L, Neilands T B, et al. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research[J].BMC Health Serv Res, 2006, 6: 44. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
[11]Sorra J S, Nieva V F. Hospital survey on patient safety culture[R]. Rockville: AHRQ Publication, 2004.
[12]穆欣, 马琳琳, 王佳, 等. 中文版患者安全护理自评量表的信度与效度测评[J]. 中国护理管理, 2012, 12(11): 32-35.
[13]方积乾. 生存质量测定方法及应用[M]. 北京: 北京医科大学出版社, 2000: 75.
[14]唐红英, 朱京慈, 何海燕, 等. 高血压治疗依从性量表的编制及信效度研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2011, 33(13): 1400-1403.
[15]李灿, 辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2008, 25(5): 541-544. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2008.05.034

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-04-01